Subject: Re: [boost] ASIO into the standard (was: Re: C++ committee meeting report)
From: Jonathan Wakely (jwakely.boost_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-08 12:03:33
On 5 July 2014 21:00, Niall Douglas wrote:
> I am grateful for the clarification, but I think my original
> statement was correct yes? STL containers don't have a noexcept move
> constructor in C++ 11 due to allocators?
No, that's not correct.
It's because some implementations either need at least one node even
in an empty container (which requires the moved-from object to
allocate memory after it's move from) or because debugging "safe STL"
implementations perform memory allocation during a move.
Although those reasons are related to memory allocation, they're not
to do with Allocators, the same reasons would apply if everything used
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk