Re: [boost] [range] Is it conceivable to have it extended?

Subject: Re: [boost] [range] Is it conceivable to have it extended?
From: Nathan Ridge (zeratul976_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-14 00:12:33

> Thanks for the link. I'll certainly have a look... Uhm, it's in Nov. and
> for C++ standard committee. So, it's in far perspective... and the
> industry I am in is always a few years behind the Standard. :-( Would
> not that be possible/sensible to address that in Boost for the time being?

Last I spoke to Eric, he had no plans to propose his library
(which, by the way, can be found here [1]) to Boost, but that
doesn't mean someone else who's willing to do the work couldn't.

I'm curious what Neil thinks of this library as a possible
future direction for Boost.Range.

Regards,
Nate

[1] https://github.com/ericniebler/range-v3