|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [core] Breaking change to boost::ref in 1.56
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-14 05:42:11
On Monday 14 July 2014 12:13:44 Peter Dimov wrote:
> Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > Why would you want r2? I mean, in what case would you intentionally write
> > code to employ recursive references?
>
> You don't write code to "employ recursive references". You write code that
> applies ref to an object of type T and stores the result in
> reference_wrapper<T>.
Would you expect this code to work:
struct my_class
{
void bar();
};
struct my_class_const
{
void bar() const;
};
template< typename T >
void foo(T const& t)
{
typedef typename boost::unwrap_reference<T>::type class_type;
boost::bind(&class_type::bar, boost::ref(t))();
}
foo(my_class_const());
my_class x;
foo(boost::ref(x));
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk