Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-30 11:49:37

Next message: Niall Douglas: "[boost] Hangs with Boost 1.56 on clang armhf"
Previous message: Bjorn Reese: "Re: [boost] Request for feedback on design of concurrent_unordered_map, plus notes on use of memory transactions"
Next in thread: Jürgen Hunold: "Re: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows"
Reply: Jürgen Hunold: "Re: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows"
Maybe reply: Matthew Musto: "Re: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows"

Anyone else found that b2 headers in 1.56 randomly misses things to
hard link on Windows? If you run it four or five times it eventually
hard links everything through monte-carlo, but it is a bit annoying.

Niall

-- 
ned Productions Limited Consulting
http://www.nedproductions.biz/ 
http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/

application/x-pkcs7-signature attachment: SMime.p7s

Next message: Niall Douglas: "[boost] Hangs with Boost 1.56 on clang armhf"
Previous message: Bjorn Reese: "Re: [boost] Request for feedback on design of concurrent_unordered_map, plus notes on use of memory transactions"
Next in thread: Jürgen Hunold: "Re: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows"
Reply: Jürgen Hunold: "Re: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows"
Maybe reply: Matthew Musto: "Re: [boost] b2 headers is unreliable on 1.56 on Windows"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk