[boost] [coroutine] failing on 1.56 RC? (was: [1.56.0] Release candidates available)

Subject: [boost] [coroutine] failing on 1.56 RC? (was: [1.56.0] Release candidates available)
From: Eric Niebler (eniebler_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-07-30 13:14:59

On 7/30/2014 12:26 AM, Andrey Semashev wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 9:06 PM, Marshall Clow <mclow.lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> Release candidate files for 1.65.0 are available at
>> http://boost.cowic.de/rc/
>>
>> As always, the release managers would appreciate it if you download
>> the candidate of your choice and give building it a try. Please report
>> both success and failure, and anything else that is noteworthy.
>>
>> This helps ensure the candidates build OK before we push them out to SourceForge.
>>
>> The files (and associated md5s) are:
>>         MD5 (boost_1_56_0_rc1.7z)               = 0ac22b92b24209286d48e4c41925cd9f
>>         MD5 (boost_1_56_0_rc1.tar.bz2)  = 5b5bfa99244b1ac5737323decceb19c2
>>         MD5 (boost_1_56_0_rc1.tar.gz)   = 2047cdd4e09cda34e7f10fec0f821175
>>         MD5 (boost_1_56_0_rc1.zip)              = 0c544f6acc85550b15cdc9221f2ac0c9
> 
> I also see compilation failures with gcc 4.6 in C++11 mode:
> 
> In file included from ./boost/thread/once.hpp:20:0,
>                  from ./boost/thread.hpp:17,
>                  from libs/coroutine/src/posix/stack_traits.cpp:22:
> ./boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp: In function ‘void
> boost::call_once(boost::once_flag&, Function&&, ArgTypes&& ...) [with
> Function = void (&)(long unsigned int*), ArgTypes = {long unsigned
> int*}]’:
> libs/coroutine/src/posix/stack_traits.cpp:57:46:   instantiated from here
> ./boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:127:9: error: call of
> overloaded ‘invoke(boost::decay<void (&)(long unsigned int*)>::type,
> boost::decay<long unsigned int*>::type)’ is ambiguous
> ./boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:127:9: note: candidates are:
> ./boost/thread/detail/invoke.hpp:538:5: note: typename
> boost::enable_if_c<(! boost::is_member_function_pointer<Fp>::value),
> Ret>::type boost::detail::invoke(Fp&&, Args&& ...) [with Ret = void,
> Fp = void (*)(long unsigned int*), Args = {long unsigned int*},
> typename boost::enable_if_c<(!
> boost::is_member_function_pointer<Fp>::value), Ret>::type = void]
> ./boost/thread/detail/invoke.hpp:544:5: note: Ret
> boost::detail::invoke(Ret (*)(Args ...), Args&& ...) [with Ret = void,
> Args = {long unsigned int*}]
> ./boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp: In function ‘void
> boost::call_once(boost::once_flag&, Function&&, ArgTypes&& ...) [with
> Function = void (&)(rlimit*), ArgTypes = {rlimit*}]’:
> libs/coroutine/src/posix/stack_traits.cpp:65:54:   instantiated from here
> ./boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:127:9: error: call of
> overloaded ‘invoke(boost::decay<void (&)(rlimit*)>::type,
> boost::decay<rlimit*>::type)’ is ambiguous
> ./boost/thread/pthread/once_atomic.hpp:127:9: note: candidates are:
> ./boost/thread/detail/invoke.hpp:538:5: note: typename
> boost::enable_if_c<(! boost::is_member_function_pointer<Fp>::value),
> Ret>::type boost::detail::invoke(Fp&&, Args&& ...) [with Ret = void,
> Fp = void (*)(rlimit*), Args = {rlimit*}, typename
> boost::enable_if_c<(! boost::is_member_function_pointer<Fp>::value),
> Ret>::type = void]
> ./boost/thread/detail/invoke.hpp:544:5: note: Ret
> boost::detail::invoke(Ret (*)(Args ...), Args&& ...) [with Ret = void,
> Args = {rlimit*}]
> 
>     "g++-4.6"  -ftemplate-depth-128 -O3 -finline-functions -Wno-inline
> -Wall -pthread -fPIC -std=c++0x -DBOOST_ALL_NO_LIB=1
> -DBOOST_CHRONO_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_CONTEXT_DYN_LINK=1
> -DBOOST_COROUTINES_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_COROUTINES_SOURCE
> -DBOOST_SYSTEM_DYN_LINK=1 -DBOOST_SYSTEM_NO_DEPRECATED
> -DBOOST_THREAD_BUILD_DLL=1 -DBOOST_THREAD_POSIX
> -DBOOST_THREAD_USE_DLL=1 -DNDEBUG  -I"." -c -o
> "bin.v2/libs/coroutine/build/gcc-4.6/release/threading-multi/posix/stack_traits.o"
> "libs/coroutine/src/posix/stack_traits.cpp"
> 
> ...failed gcc.compile.c++
> bin.v2/libs/coroutine/build/gcc-4.6/release/threading-multi/posix/stack_traits.o...

Ouch. Can anybody else repro this? Oliver, thoughts?

Eric