Subject: [boost] sentinels vs iterators (was: NTCTS Iterator)
From: Eric Niebler (eniebler_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-20 13:51:40
On 08/20/2014 07:40 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
> See http://beman.github.io/ntcts_iterator/
> or https://github.com/Beman/ntcts_iterator
The need for such a thing is an unfortunate side-effect of the fact that
a range's begin and end iterators must have the same type. I'm building
a range library that loosens that restriction and writing a proposal to
get it into the standard.
I'd be curious if you have experience about scenarios where using your
ntcts_iterator is faster or slower that simply finding the end of the
string first with strlen and then calling the algorithm with raw pointers.
I've blogged about my work here:
My proposal is coming together here:
Disclaimer: it's in a *very* rough, incomplete state.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk