Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [core/noncopyable][test/boost::unit_test::singleton] massive test failures
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-21 06:10:47

Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
> There's a problem with noncopyable and boost::unit_test::singleton in
> Intel 13 for Linux in C++11 compatibility mode that's rippling through
> many Boost libs. [...]

Not that this has anything to do with the specific issue, but I wonder why
noncopyable has been changed to use the shiny new =delete/constexpr/=default
features - there wasn't anything wrong with the old implementation. I also
wonder if people realize that noncopyable is now, by my reading of the
standard, a trivial class. This includes trivially copyable.

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at