Re: [boost] [core/noncopyable][test/boost::unit_test::singleton] massive test failures

Subject: Re: [boost] [core/noncopyable][test/boost::unit_test::singleton] massive test failures
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-21 06:10:47

Joaquin M Lopez Munoz wrote:
> There's a problem with noncopyable and boost::unit_test::singleton in 
> Intel 13 for Linux in C++11 compatibility mode that's rippling through 
> many Boost libs. [...]

Not that this has anything to do with the specific issue, but I wonder why 
noncopyable has been changed to use the shiny new =delete/constexpr/=default 
features - there wasn't anything wrong with the old implementation. I also 
wonder if people realize that noncopyable is now, by my reading of the 
standard, a trivial class. This includes trivially copyable.