Re: [boost] [core/noncopyable][test/boost::unit_test::singleton] massive test failures

Subject: Re: [boost] [core/noncopyable][test/boost::unit_test::singleton] massive test failures
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-21 13:23:38

Antony Polukhin wrote:

> Because as a benefit we get better results for `is_trivial` and 
> `is_trivially_constructible` traits.

As already mentioned, I'm not that keen on noncopyable being is_trivial 
which implies is_trivially_copyable. The rest of the argument could go 
either way but I have certain trouble with the view that noncopyable being 
trivially copyable could be described as 'better' with a straight face.