Subject: Re: [boost] poly_collection (was sentinels vs iterators)
From: Brian Wood (woodbrian77_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-08-27 11:19:13
Ion Gazta?aga <igaztanaga <at> gmail.com> writes:
> El 23/08/2014 20:53, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz escribi?:
>> A container that is not a sequence, unordered but not associative.
>> unordered_collection might be an alternative name.
> This name misses the critical feature that elements are polymorphic.
Why use collection rather than container? poly_container.
>> An interesting addition to Boost.Container?
> If I had the time :-/ I' ve been considering working a little more on
> this to turn the initial sketch into something resembling a full-fledged
> container, but it'd take me some days' work I don't have.
I couldn't sleep for a while last night and my thoughts turned
to this subject. I had thought this was an interesting (birds of
a feather) idea and then realized it would also be helpful from
a serialization perspective. Rather than having to marshal a
type identifier before each instance, you could (iiuc) marshal
a type identifier and how many instances will follow. Something
So it would reduce the serialization overhead compared to other
I think it's a good idea and look forward to seeing it developed further.
-- Brian Ebenezer Enterprises - In G-d we trust. http://webEbenezer.net
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk