Re: [boost] [spinlock] concurrent_unordered_map is ready for review

Subject: Re: [boost] [spinlock] concurrent_unordered_map is ready for review
From: Edward Diener (eldiener_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-01 15:41:32

On 9/1/2014 12:35 PM, Niall Douglas wrote:
> On 1 Sep 2014 at 15:27, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>
>> Do you intend this to be a separate library, or would it go into something
>> like Boost.Container?
>
> Not sure yet. My next goal is no-alloc promise-future, also based on
> spinlocks.
>
> I don't intend to "finish" concurrent_unordered_map past what is
> already done, and I suspect no Boost library will accept it until I
> or someone else does.

What do you mean by the last part of your sentence ?