Re: [boost] [optional] Changes in Boost.Optional

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Changes in Boost.Optional
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-02 05:38:00

On September 1, 2014 10:15:14 PM EDT, Edward Diener <eldiener_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>On 9/1/2014 10:04 PM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>> On Tue Sep 02 2014 at 5:48:09 AM Edward Diener
><eldiener_at_[hidden]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 9/1/2014 11:48 AM, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
>>>> On Tue Aug 26 2014 at 3:59:12 PM Dean Michael Berris <
>>> mikhailberis_at_[hidden]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue Aug 26 2014 at 9:38:37 AM Eric Niebler <eniebler_at_[hidden]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 08/24/2014 11:20 AM, Rob Stewart wrote:
>>>>>>> [Corrected subject to target optional.]
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On August 24, 2014 7:55:11 AM EDT, Dean Michael Berris <
>>>>>> mikhailberis_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>>>>>>> I realize that this message may have not passed the spam
>filters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can someone comment on the changes in Boost.Optional in 1.56.0
>>> breaking
>>>>>>>> existing code?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <snip>

Thank you!

>>>>>>

[huge snip]

>Look at https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/wiki/StartModPatchAndPullReq 
>and follow the directions under "Pull Requests" and "Forking a Single 
>Repo". Having access to MSVC 2010 should not be a big deal for a 
>maintainer. If you find after your pull request that nobody is 
>responding to it within a week or two after you make it, then I would 
>say to post back here and try to find the right person to respond. But 
>until then let the normal Pull Request process play itself out.

[snip footer]

Please avoid over-quoting.

___
Rob

(Sent from my portable computation engine)