Subject: Re: [boost] [asio] RFC on new reliable UDP library
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-11 08:28:21
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 4:14 PM, Niall Douglas
> On 11 Sep 2014 at 15:10, Andrey Semashev wrote:
>> > Hence the choice of UDT over SCTP as the second wire
>> > format we are likely to implement.
>> UDT over SCTP looks like a duplicate work since the functionality of
>> these protocols largely overlap (as far as I can see from Wikipedia).
>> Basically, that's why SCTP looks so appealing - it offers everything
>> UDT does and then some, and it is standardized.
> I think you thought I said we intend to implement UDT atop of SCTP.
> SCTP isn't useful to us due to the lack of home networking equipment
> support, we won't be implementing that.
Oh, sorry, I misread your previous reply.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk