Re: [boost] [asio] RFC on new reliable UDP library

Subject: Re: [boost] [asio] RFC on new reliable UDP library
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-11 13:20:11

On Thursday 11 September 2014 09:50:16 adzm wrote:
> 
> For example, over the years I've coded several UDP hole punch
> implementations, and have always wanted to submit them to boost, but they
> ended up depending on some non-standard functionality for things like
> authentication, match-making, IP address detection, etc. The alternative
> leads to something like ICE, but the complexity level rises quickly after
> that.

I think an ICE library (which is not connected to the proposed or any other 
transport protocol) would be a very valuable addition to Boost. I would 
certainly be interested in it.