Subject: Re: [boost] [EXTERNAL] [mpl] [build] [testing] Merge pull requests
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-20 04:07:46
On Friday 19 September 2014 22:21:27 Suckow, Thomas J wrote:
> >>ThereÂ¹s been some list discussion but my overall concern is that
> >> we canÂ¹t clearly explain why some develop testers are broken and others
> >> working okay. The commit completely broke Darwin, Debian, FreeBSD, QNX
> >> Windows. But whatÂ¹s really worrying is that some RHEL testers are still
> >> merrily cycling while other RHEL testers are broken. Same for Ubuntu,
> >> are cycling okay while some are broken.
> Based on my limited testing, it would appear to me that it works on
> systems with headers from another version of boost in /usr/include or
That's an interesting idea. MPL didn't change for quite a while, so it could
Noel, if you have access to a running tester, could you verify this theory?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk