Subject: Re: [boost] [containers] Clarifications on incomplete type support?
From: Mikael Persson (mikael.s.persson_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-22 17:57:50
> Have you found any need to support member functions of containers of
I don't think there is any need for that. What really matters is the memory
layouts, i.e., to be able to form sizeof(container<T>) and
sizeof(container<T>::iterator) and so on for other iterators. I really
haven't encountered nor am I able to think of any context where you would
need to write code that uses members of a container of incomplete types (or
of an iterator thereof). It's very easy to move code around or to correctly
place the instantiation points of the code to where all types are complete,
it's really the memory layout that is nearly impossible to form safely if
you have to work around an incomplete type problem. Just like having
pointers to incomplete types doesn't allow you to really do anything with
them (e.g., pointer arithmetic) until the type's completed, but what
matters is that you can **form** pointer variables.
It would be tedious and tricky to guarantee that specific members will work
for incomplete types, and it might significantly restrict the
Thanks for merging my commit.
BTW, while testing my new BGL code against the current branch of
Boost.Container, I also discovered that many of my unit-tests trigger
infinite memory-leaking loops (when sets or lists are used as containers),
which was not the case against version 1.54 of Boost.Container. It will
take some time to track down where this is coming from, but if it comes
from Boost.Container, you'll hear from me again about fixing those bugs ;)
(N.B.: it's very possible that the errors are on my side of things, not
yours, but I need to investigate it first).
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk