Re: [boost] New C++14 config macros - opinions wanted

Subject: Re: [boost] New C++14 config macros - opinions wanted
From: Kohei Takahashi (flast_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-09-24 21:13:30

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi John,

On 2014/09/25 2:12, John Maddock wrote:
> There is a pull request to add new config macros for C++14
> features (https://github.com/boostorg/config/pull/39), I have a few
> questions really, particularly for those more familiar with C++14
> than me:
Thank you for picking up my PR.

> * Do we need these?
Fusion starts to support constexpr but, some function don't compile
due to unmet c++11 constexpr limitations. I think it is inconvenient
for c++11 user who doesn't require constexpr.
This is my first motivation.

> * Are these the correct names? * Are the proposed tests correct?
I anxious the wording; singular or plural form? Is the name too long? ...

Thanks,
Kohei Takahashi
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (MingW32)
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=Oof+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----