Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] Why is iterator_traits<unordered_map<K, M>>::pointer a detail::ptr_node type rather than value_type *?
From: Daniel James (dnljms_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-10-17 17:20:23

Next message: Marshall Clow: "[boost] 1.57.0 beta 1 release candidates available for testing"
Previous message: Hartmut Kaiser: "Re: [boost] Non-allocating future-promise"
In reply to: Alex Mohr: "[boost] Why is iterator_traits<unordered_map<K, M>>::pointer a detail::ptr_node type rather than value_type *?"
Next in thread: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Why is iterator_traits<unordered_map<K, M>>::pointer a detail::ptr_node type rather than value_type *?"
Reply: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] Why is iterator_traits<unordered_map<K, M>>::pointer a detail::ptr_node type rather than value_type *?"

On 17 October 2014 22:06, Alex Mohr <amohr_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Why shouldn't iterator_traits<>::pointer be Value* here?

I imagine that would be what is known as a bug.

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk