Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Safe optional
From: Mostafa (mostafa_working_away_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-17 02:29:27
On Sun, 16 Nov 2014 23:04:43 -0800, Andrzej Krzemienski
> Hi Everyone,
> I would like to run an idea through everyone in this list. There is a
> recurring complaint about Boost.Optional that it allows you to do
> 1. Inadvertent mixed comparisons between T and optional<T>
> 2. Unintended conversion from T to optional<T>
> 3. "Unchecked" access to the contained object, which causes an UB when
> performed on an uninitialized optional object.
Number 3 is really not an issue IMO. If you're going to overload operator*
then existing C++ practice dictates that you have to do if(opt) before
dereferencing opt, otherwise you'll have UB.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk