Re: [boost] [optional] Safe optional

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Safe optional
From: Bjorn Reese (breese_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-18 08:37:29

On 11/18/2014 07:59 AM, Vicente J. Botet Escriba wrote:

> The current problem we have with our TBoost.Expected is that we don't
> have an implementation for C++98 compilers :(
> If the Boost community can accept a C++11 only library I'll be glad to
> work on preparing it for review.

Yes please.

The consensus is that C++11 only libraries are acceptable.