Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-24 03:37:13

Next message: Viktor Sehr: "[boost] [range][extensions] What is happening with the range extensions?"
Previous message: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea"
Next in thread: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea"
Reply: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea"
Reply: Robert Ramey: "[boost] [safe_numerics] [future of boost]questioning the basic idea"

2014-11-18 19:45 GMT+01:00 Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]>:

> I'm NOT really pushing for this as a boost library
>

I am not sure I got your message right.
Are you saying SafeNumerics library is there in the Incubator only to test
the Incubator?

I am still in the process of reviewing it. Does it mean it will be done for
nothing?

Regards,
Andrzej

Next message: Viktor Sehr: "[boost] [range][extensions] What is happening with the range extensions?"
Previous message: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?"
In reply to: Robert Ramey: "Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea"
Next in thread: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea"
Reply: Andrzej Krzemienski: "Re: [boost] [safe_numerics] questioning the basic idea"
Reply: Robert Ramey: "[boost] [safe_numerics] [future of boost]questioning the basic idea"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk