Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] Safe optional
From: Gottlob Frege (gottlobfrege_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-24 13:17:56
On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> the docs also recommends NOT to use optional<T> to signal a potential
> error/difficulty in computing T:
> This is the choice made for optional<T>. The authors of expected<T, E> may
> want to choose a different model.
expected<T,E> is almost surely written for exactly that purpose.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk