Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?

Subject: Re: [boost] [optional] operator<(optional<T>, T) -- is it wrong?
From: Olaf van der Spek (ml_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-11-27 11:18:11

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 5:08 PM, Marcel Raad <raad_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> David Stone <david <at> doublewise.net> writes:
>
>> Has anyone reading this list every actually
>> used std::map<boost::optional<T>, U>?
>
> Yes, I frequently use that.

Could you describe how you're using it? Some code perhaps?

-- 
Olaf