Subject: Re: [boost] List of C++ 11 only Boost libraries and their status?
From: Klaim - JoÃ«l Lamotte (mjklaim_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-01 05:13:45
I believe people would care less if a library is standard or not
if there was an easy way to get the library and integrate it in a project.
Most Python and Ruby users have no reluctance into trying a library
because it's so easy to plug one in by copy/paste or by using
pip or gem.
Having a standard library that only provide essential necessities
would be tolerable in such a context.
The other issue with standardising a library is that it seem insanely hard
to update it later for fixes.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk