Subject: Re: [boost] [documentation] Are SVG's in documentation viable now?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-09 12:50:52
On Tuesday 09 December 2014 17:27:25 John Maddock wrote:
> > Just for your interest, here's is like I see the page with Firefox 34 64
> > http://ibin.co/1jwmEuouKTbf (or http://imagebin.ca/v/1jwmEuouKTbf )
> > And here is with chrome 39.0.2171.71 (64-bit)
> > The PNG versions appears smoother then SVG ones (IMO).
> > http://ibin.co/1jwoB7Ssh1xV (or http://imagebin.ca/v/1jwoB7Ssh1xV)
> > In both cases, my OS is linux Fedora 20 x86_64.
> It looks to me like the PNG's are anti-aliased, but the SVG's aren't,
> which would probably be a display setting or something?
> In any case, I've tried them again slightly larger than before
> (http://jzmaddock.github.io/doctest/html/svg_test/equations.html) is
> this any better?
Firefox 34.0, Kubuntu 14.10.
The italic z's have no diagonal lines for me.
There's no such issue in Chrome 39, though.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk