Subject: Re: [boost] [documentation] Are SVG's in documentation viable now?
From: Marco Guazzone (marco.guazzone_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-10 07:17:36
On Tue, Dec 9, 2014 at 6:27 PM, John Maddock <boost.regex_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> It looks to me like the PNG's are anti-aliased, but the SVG's aren't, which
> would probably be a display setting or something?
I've just looked in my window manager settings and anti-alias is enabled.
> In any case, I've tried them again slightly larger than before
> (http://jzmaddock.github.io/doctest/html/svg_test/equations.html) is this
> any better?
Better than before, but not wrt PNG (IMO)
This is the result in Firefox
- Greek symbols: some of the special greek symbols (pi, epsilon,...)
looks clearer in PNG. For example, compare $\pi$ in
"bernoulli_numbers2" and $\varepsilon$ in "sinh3"
- Spacing: it seems SVG formulas are more narrow and math symbols are
closer than their PNG counterparts. For example, compare the
$\cos\phi$ and $\sin\phi$ expressions in the "bessel_derivatives3". On
the SVG side, The $\cos$ ($\sin$) is very close to $\phi$, while on
the PNG side there is a little space that makes the expression more
Anyway, aside these small issues, I vote for the transition to SVG ;)
I think that my issues are motivated by your note in the original
email "... the equations reference Window's specific fonts,...".
So this can be easily solved in the future
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk