Subject: Re: [boost] [core] A better boost::swap
From: Rob Stewart (robertstewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2014-12-29 05:22:29
On December 28, 2014 1:42:54 PM EST, Pete Bartlett <pete_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>>I'm sure Antony meant to change the implementation to match the ideas
>in Ion's code, not use the test implementation he showed.
>But isn't the whole idea to depend on Boost.Move so that swap can
>from move emulation?
>As Peter said, a new Boost.Swap could depend on Move, but Core should
It could be implemented based upon C++11 move semantics, when available. If there were a way to detect and use Boost.Move without requiring a reference to it, that would be ideal, of course.
(Sent from my portable computation engine)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk