Subject: Re: [boost] Directory structure not quite right yet?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-02 00:16:34
Bjørn Roald wrote:
> However, "b2 stage" could by default have same effect as "b2
> install --prefix=.", then you will get exactly what you want I think.
No, this is not what I want. I don't want two copies of the headers, one in
include/boost/, and one in boost/ (that would be pretty stupid). I don't
want a symlink include/boost -> boost (somewhat less stupid).
When I go somewhere inside the Boost source tree, and use b2 to build a
target, and that target has #include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>, I want b2 to
create a link include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp ->
libs/smart_ptr/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp, and then to use
<include>include, rather than creating a link boost/shared_ptr.hpp ->
libs/smart_ptr/include/boost/shared_ptr.hpp and using <include>. .
Note that this has nothing to do with staging or installing. The "headers"
target is an implicit dependency. Even if I had a copy of the headers in
include/boost/, b2 would still recreate them in boost/ each time I build
I agree that this would not be an issue if b2 used separate include paths
for each library.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk