Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] match()
From: Eelis (eelis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-07 03:54:57
On 2015-01-07 09:41, Eelis wrote:
> I'm not sure its complexity gives that implementation any advantages.
(One difference is that my implementation uses common_type to compute the return type, whereas theirs rejects the call if the return types are not all the same.)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk