Subject: Re: [boost] A proposal for the creation of a new module, Core Type Traits
From: John Maddock (boost.regex_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-08 06:13:58
> These two problems could be avoided if we were to have core type traits
> whose interface consisted solely of a member integral constant called
> "value", without any other required members or base classes, and which
> were only allowed to depend on Config or StaticAssert.
I'm less keen on this because it fractures the lib into two conceptually
different parts. Let me mess around with some code and see if something
better is possible.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk