Subject: Re: [boost] [variant] match()
From: Eelis (eelis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-09 17:54:48
On 2015-01-09 19:35, Matt Calabrese wrote:
> You seem to be not getting that discriminated_union and variant each are
> used in different scenarios.
> One quick scenario for where you want a variant is:
Why do you want a variant here? Can't you define an apply() for discriminated_union that does exactly what you want? Why do you need a different type? More specifically, why do you need a type for which
randomly breaks in generic code?