Subject: Re: [boost] [Boost-testing] Linux regression test runners - What do devs want?
From: Blower, Melanie (melanie.blower_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-13 07:49:57
How do you compare the results of running the same compiler on Linux and QNX? Do you just eyeball the report on the website, or do you use a script to compare the test results on the filesystem?
Thanks and regards,
From: Boost-Testing [mailto:boost-testing-bounces_at_[hidden]] On Behalf Of Niklas Angare
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2015 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: [Boost-testing] Linux regression test runners - What do devs want?
"Tom Kent" <lists_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> Instead of running lots of different versions, I was thinking about
> running various compatibility options of the two main compilers...I've
> seen some other test runners with things like libc++, c++11, c++14,
> etc. My real question, would developers be better served by these
> options than different versions? Would they prefer both with longer
> revisit times between each test type? Other thoughts?
My runners use gcc 4.4(.2) (in gnu++0x mode) on QNX, and it's useful to be able to compare to the same compiler running on Linux. I'm sure it's the same for other non-Linux environments such as MinGW. Currently there are other runners that match my compiler configuration better than yours do, but you get the idea.
Boost-Testing mailing list
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk