Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a FIX Protocol Library?
From: Felipe Magno de Almeida (felipe.m.almeida_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-14 19:10:14
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Julien Nitard <julien.nitard_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On 15 Jan 2015 02:58, "Gottlob Frege" <gottlobfrege_at_[hidden]> wrote:
>> My gut instinct is that FIX is too domain-specific, whereas Boost is
>> typically domain-agnostic libraries. Nut maybe I'm wrong about that?
> No you're not. I use fix at work and that's the last thing we'd expect from
I don't feel the same way. I have been thinking of writing a FIX protocol
parser based on boost.spirit for boost for a while already.
-- Felipe Magno de Almeida
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk