Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 09:34:59
Ion Gaztañaga wrote:
> In any case with my alternative implementation you could avoid even
> Boost.PP for manteinance and avoid all those overloads.
My first thought when looking at is_function was also to suggest
"is_convertible<T&,T*>", but then I saw that Ion has already got to it
first, complete with the nullptr_t check.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk