Subject: Re: [boost] boost interval arithmetic
From: Thijs van den Berg (thijs_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 09:40:22
On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 3:18 PM, ÐÐ°Ð²ÐµÐ» ÐÑÐ´Ð°Ð½ <coodan_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> What kind of arguments you would like after all?
> Do you really want to discuss misconception of the mathematical class it
> it's misconcepted terms?!
> No, that's irrelvant, we need to stick to the definitions of interval that
boost interval claims to use, and discuss if the code adheres to those
specs. I.e. way library users will expect and rely upon.
Generic set theoretical discussions are off-topic imo.
Ideally you'd post C++ code and show that it doesn't do what you expected
based on the documentation, and not based on what you incorrectly think
boost interval should be (a set algebra lib)
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk