Subject: Re: [boost] Interest in a FIX Protocol Library?
From: Eelis (eelis_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 15:33:58
On 2015-01-12 23:55, Marius Dobrea wrote:
> Let me know what you think.
It is very unlikely that a Boost FIX library would make the specific combination of interface/efficiency/complexity/configurability/extensibility compromises/tradeoffs/choices that suit the specific requirements we have for a FIX library at the trading company I work for. Nor would we benefit from integration with our other libraries and conventions. So a Boost FIX library would probably not be of much use to us.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk