Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] Marking explicit failures -- need help
From: Andrzej Krzemienski (akrzemi1_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 16:55:08


2015-01-14 15:00 GMT+01:00 Andrzej Krzemienski <akrzemi1_at_[hidden]>:

> Hi All,
> I would like to make some regression tests as expected to fail in
> explicit-failures-markup.xml, but I have the following problem. Not sure if
> this is specific to Optional tests:
> http://www.boost.org/development/tests/develop/developer/optional.html
>
> I have two "columns" with the same toolset label "gcc-4.4.7" from tester
> "Sandia". On one the test passes, on the other: it fails. This is because
> on one C++0x is enabled. But I cannot tell it from the toolset label alone,
> and therefore I cannot make the correct entry in failures-markup.xml:
> either I mark too much or too little.
>
> Does anyone know away around it? Can you mark failures based on something
> else than toolset name?
>
> Regards,
> Andrzej
>

Really, is it only me who is facing this problem?


Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk