Subject: Re: [boost] [sync] has no master branch?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 18:41:49
On Friday 16 January 2015 02:37:56 you wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 00:54:21 Peter Dimov wrote:
> > Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > > What's the point in having the master branch then?
> > The specific problem I was having was that any "git submodule foreach"
> > that
> > references "master" failed at libs/sync.
> Was that because your superproject's develop branch had been checked out
> when you ran the commands?
> > But in general, I'd think that the point of having the master branch for
> > Sync would be the same as for the other libraries; look at the develop
> > regression tests, if they pass, merge to master.
> Since the master branch of the superproject does not have Sync, the tests
> would not run on master, as I understand.
> I could create master. It's just I would have to do merging then, which is
> kind of pointless since there really is just develop at this stage.
Oh, and BTW, as I remember Sync relies on DateTime features in develop. I'm
not sure if these features were merged to master.