Subject: Re: [boost] [sync] has no master branch?
From: Andrey Semashev (andrey.semashev_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-15 18:41:49
On Friday 16 January 2015 02:37:56 you wrote:
> On Friday 16 January 2015 00:54:21 Peter Dimov wrote:
> > Andrey Semashev wrote:
> > > What's the point in having the master branch then?
> > The specific problem I was having was that any "git submodule foreach"
> > that
> > references "master" failed at libs/sync.
> Was that because your superproject's develop branch had been checked out
> when you ran the commands?
> > But in general, I'd think that the point of having the master branch for
> > Sync would be the same as for the other libraries; look at the develop
> > regression tests, if they pass, merge to master.
> Since the master branch of the superproject does not have Sync, the tests
> would not run on master, as I understand.
> I could create master. It's just I would have to do merging then, which is
> kind of pointless since there really is just develop at this stage.
Oh, and BTW, as I remember Sync relies on DateTime features in develop. I'm
not sure if these features were merged to master.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk