Subject: Re: [boost] transforming ex. boost lib into C++11-only lib?
From: Oliver Kowalke (oliver.kowalke_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-22 13:17:12
2015-01-22 19:05 GMT+01:00 Robert Ramey <ramey_at_[hidden]>:
> Niall Douglas wrote
> > On 22 Jan 2015 at 15:20, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >> is it permitted to transform an existing boost library into a C++11-only
> >> library?
> > If you meant here "transform an existing boost library into a
> > C++11-only *Boost* library with C++ 11 only APIs" then I think you
> > need to cycle the library name. Precedent here is that Signals went
> > to Signals2, here I should think Coroutine ought to become
> > Coroutine2.
> So in this case, I would prefer the creation of Library2 as in the first
> case above.
> Certainly this worked well with signals and other libraries should follow
> that model.
OK - thx for your suggestions.
Who do I have to ask for an additional coroutine2 sub-module?
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk