Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] RFC Expression Validity Asserts
From: pfultz2 (pfultz2_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-23 13:05:53

Next message: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] Merge procedure to master (was: Release sponsorship (was: Re: Boost 1.58 schedule available?))"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Endian mini-review"
In reply to: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] RFC Expression Validity Asserts"
Next in thread: Piotr Wygocki: "Re: [boost] RFC Expression Validity Asserts"

> According to the standard, the type of the object yielded by a lambda
> expression has an implicitly declared default constructor/copy
> constructor/destructor

I believe that a lambda never has a default constructor even for stateless
lambdas.(Even though, it should).

Paul

--
View this message in context: http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/RFC-Expression-Validity-Asserts-tp4671480p4671585.html
Sent from the Boost - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Next message: Barend Gehrels: "Re: [boost] Merge procedure to master (was: Release sponsorship (was: Re: Boost 1.58 schedule available?))"
Previous message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] [Review] Boost.Endian mini-review"
In reply to: Matt Calabrese: "Re: [boost] RFC Expression Validity Asserts"
Next in thread: Piotr Wygocki: "Re: [boost] RFC Expression Validity Asserts"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk