Subject: Re: [boost] [endian] [bikeshed] Conversion function naming discussion
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-01-25 09:32:59
Beman Dawes wrote:
> The current names I'm least comfortable with are the conversion function
> names in the endian sub-namespace:
> These are quite explicit, but are a bit too long and awkward for my taste.
> I'd be willing to change these names if someone can come up with
> replacements that are shorter and less awkward, but still reasonable
You can consider 'native' to be implicit and use
although I, personally, am not sure whether this is an improvement.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk