Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version

Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Stephen Kelly (hello_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-01 04:16:24

John Maddock wrote:

> 2) What do we do about common_type?

This is still not addressed, right?

Can you say what the current state of the rewrite is, the intention of how 
it will be used (ie, replace existing vs maintained in parallel), and 
blockers to reaching that point?

Thanks,

Steve.