Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows
From: Domagoj Saric (domagoj.saric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 03:51:19

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] To split, or not to split, or something else? RE: type_traits rewrite, modularization, dependencies, etc."
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"

On 31.1.2015. 16:07, Beman Dawes wrote:
> 4. The Windows directory.
>
> (4) Makes me queasy.

Given that there is a C:\Windows\Temp directory (and it gets recreated by
Windows if you delete it even if you divert the system TEMP and TMP env.
variables to a different directory) the documentation 'probably' meant "The
Windows\Temp directory" not the Windows directory itself...

-- 
Domagoj Saric
Software Architect
www.LittleEndian.com

Next message: Peter Dimov: "Re: [boost] To split, or not to split, or something else? RE: type_traits rewrite, modularization, dependencies, etc."
Previous message: Vicente J. Botet Escriba: "Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version"
In reply to: Beman Dawes: "[boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Next in thread: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"
Reply: Beman Dawes: "Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk