Subject: Re: [boost] [type_traits] Rewrite and dependency free version
From: Niall Douglas (s_sourceforge_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-03 16:56:04
On 3 Feb 2015 at 12:40, Robert Ramey wrote:
> As far as I can tell, my proposal for "bridging headers" is the only
> credible specific one suggested so far. I conceded that I haven't spent
> a lot of time thinking through the implications (though it seems that I've
> spent more than others). That's why I've asked for comments. So far I
> haven't got any real comment on it. I'm still thinking about it.
Your bridging headers sound like a more brittle and harder to
maintain equivalent to my API binding proposal.
Mine does require a very new compiler however, and yours I expect
-- ned Productions Limited Consulting http://www.nedproductions.biz/ http://ie.linkedin.com/in/nialldouglas/
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk