Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows

Subject: Re: [boost] [filesystem] temp_directory_path() behavior on Windows
From: Domagoj Saric (domagoj.saric_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-04 08:44:47

On 4.2.2015. 1:32, Niall Douglas wrote:
> I think it's faster to iterate all ten in that order actually. The
> big problem with caching results is that if your temp drive is on a
> network share, it can come and go over the lifetime of your process.

Is there actually 'anyone out there' that does this? Isn't a temporary on a 
network/removable drive kind of oxymoronic?

-- 
Domagoj Saric
Software Architect
www.LittleEndian.com