Boost :

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Subject: Re: [boost] [c++11] MSVC does not define __cplusplus?
From: Mathias Gaunard (mathias.gaunard_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-07 16:16:36

Next message: Ganesh Prasad: "Re: [boost] A proposal"
Previous message: Dmitry Moskalchuk: "[boost] Regression testing: too many runners?"
In reply to: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [c++11] MSVC does not define __cplusplus?"

On 07/02/2015 19:34, Oliver Kowalke wrote:
> 2015-02-07 17:13 GMT+01:00 Niall Douglas <s_sourceforge_at_[hidden]>:
>
>> __cplusplus is fairly useless except for detecting a C++ compiler.
>>
>
> hmmm - I thought that 201103L indicates an complete C++11 feature set

No Visual C++ revision has a complete C+11 feature set anyway.

Next message: Ganesh Prasad: "Re: [boost] A proposal"
Previous message: Dmitry Moskalchuk: "[boost] Regression testing: too many runners?"
In reply to: Oliver Kowalke: "Re: [boost] [c++11] MSVC does not define __cplusplus?"

Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view

Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk