|
Boost : |
Subject: Re: [boost] [MultiIndex] Memory consumption of ordered indices
From: Joaquin M Lopez Munoz (joaquin_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-20 09:01:36
Olaf van der Spek <ml <at> vdspek.org> writes:
>
> Hi,
>
> What's the memory consumption of ordered indices? Is it implemented as
> a linked list, so two pointers per element?
The overhead (on most platforms) is three pointers per node (and index):
http://stackoverflow.com/a/4208349/213114
Color is usually embedded into one of the pointers:
http://bannalia.blogspot.com/2008/11/optimizing-red-black-tree-color-bits.html
> In that case for a write-only data structure an external ptr vector
> would make more sense wouldn't it?
What's a "write-only" structure supposed to be useful for? Anyway, s
sorted vector is definitely better in terms of memory consumption than
a single-index multi_index_container.
Joaquin M López Muñoz
Telefónica
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk