Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [MultiIndex] Memory consumption of ordered indices
From: Rob Stewart (rob.stewart_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-02-20 17:31:44

On February 20, 2015 4:59:07 PM EST, Olaf van der Spek <ml_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Joaquin M Lopez Munoz
> <joaquin_at_[hidden]> wrote:
> > Olaf van der Spek <ml <at>> writes:
> >
> >> In that case for a write-only data structure an external ptr vector
> >> would make more sense wouldn't it?
> >
> > What's a "write-only" structure supposed to be useful for? Anyway, s
> > sorted vector is definitely better in terms of memory consumption
> than
> > a single-index multi_index_container.
> The data structure is filled once (data read from DB) and then queried
> lots.
> Perhaps a flat_map would be better suited.

Perhaps you mean "write once" rather than "write only"?


(Sent from my portable computation engine)

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at