Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that is much faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-13 04:22:46

El 13/03/2015 a las 8:51, Giacomo Drago escribió:
> Hi
> My library is not ready for a formal review process, and I'd like to ask
> whether there is some potential interest first, thus saving everybody a
> lot of time.
> I have been working on a flat_map
> (
> variant that keeps some of the distinctive features of the original one
> (contiguous storage/cache friendliness, zero memory
> overhead/shrink_to_fit support, vector-based representation, etc...) but
> makes insertion and erasure of the elements much faster, at the price of
> a slower lookup and in-order traversal.

Just a question. Are your insertions one by one or by range?



Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at