Subject: Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that is much faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?
From: Ion Gaztañaga (igaztanaga_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-13 09:38:49
El 13/03/2015 a las 14:38, Phil Endecott escribió:
> (Personally, I have a flat_map that does batched insertions i.e. the new
> items are appended individually and then merged at the end of the batch.
> This will have significant benefits for some workloads.)
Yes, this should be added to flat_map. The interface won't be very
pretty, but I would like to hear suggestions in this direction.
Boost list run by bdawes at acm.org, gregod at cs.rpi.edu, cpdaniel at pacbell.net, john at johnmaddock.co.uk