Boost logo

Boost :

Subject: Re: [boost] [flat_map] Any interest in a flat_map variant that ismuch faster on insertion/erase at the price of a slower lookup?
From: Peter Dimov (lists_at_[hidden])
Date: 2015-03-13 15:28:21

Phil Endecott wrote:

> I think we discussed this before. My preferred approach is
> flat_set S;
> {
> flat_set::batch b(S);
> b.insert(xxx);
> b.insert(yyy);
> } // b's dtor does the merge

What do you do when b.insert(yyy) throws?

Boost list run by bdawes at, gregod at, cpdaniel at, john at